The Logical Reasoning test assesses candidates' ability to make a good conclusion based on given preconditions.
It's an ideal test for pre-employment screening. The majority of todays office-based jobs require thoughtful, logical decisions, as well as the ability to rationalize them. The ability to avoid logical fallacies when deciding is one of the key distinctions between an excellent and an average employee.
This test requires candidates to select valid conclusions based on given preconditions.
Recommended Job Roles
Administrative Assistant
Data Analyst
Financial Analyst
Financial Manager
Manager
Project Manager
Sales Manager
Software Developer
Sample Candidate Report
Sample Free Questions
Album Sales
1min
-
Easy
Easy
-
MCQ
Logical Reasoning
Zero-sum thinking
Public
Logical Reasoning
The majority of todays office-based jobs require thoughtful, logical decisions, as well as the ability to rationalize them.
Zero-sum thinking
A cognitive bias that describes when an individual thinks that a situation is like a zero-sum game, where one person's gain would be another's loss, can lead to less than optimal solutions where both persons lose more than they should.
Public
Public questions (free account) are common interview questions. They are great for practicing, or if you want to filter candidates using the classic problems.
An eagerly awaited new album has been leaked several hours before its official release. Listeners are now able to download the album for free.
How will this affect album sales?
Horse Race
1min
-
Easy
Easy
-
MCA
Logical Reasoning
Appeal to probability
Public
Logical Reasoning
The majority of todays office-based jobs require thoughtful, logical decisions, as well as the ability to rationalize them.
Appeal to probability
A logical fallacy of taking something for granted, because it would probably be the case, can lead to expensive business mistakes when a risk materializes.
Public
Public questions (free account) are common interview questions. They are great for practicing, or if you want to filter candidates using the classic problems.
Dan put a large bet on a horse. However, a day before the race, the horse was injured.
Select which of the following statements are true:
(Select all acceptable answers.)
Postcard
2min
-
Easy
Easy
-
NUM
Logical Reasoning
Attribute substitution
Public
Logical Reasoning
The majority of todays office-based jobs require thoughtful, logical decisions, as well as the ability to rationalize them.
Attribute substitution
When we try to answer a difficult question, we often actually answer a related but different question, without realizing that a substitution has taken place and this can lead to wrong decisions.
Public
Public questions (free account) are common interview questions. They are great for practicing, or if you want to filter candidates using the classic problems.
A postcard and a stamp together cost $1.50. The postcard costs one dollar more than the stamp.
How much does the stamp cost?
Premium Questions
The premium question library contains our unique, hand-crafted questions. We offer a refund if you find any of them answered online.
Questions
Workplace, Drawing the Next Card, Business Reports, Fruit Juice Processing, Penny Flipping, Red Black Chart, World Championship, Elementary School, Kindergarten, Mold, Robots, Alarm System, Game Rules, All-Stars, Busy Intersection, Fossil Dig, Lucky Roller, Bikers, Masked Burglar, Candidate Answers, Condominium, Customer Parking, Math Courses, Road Trip, Blue-collar Workers, Thief, Working Week, Traffic TicketsSkills
Logical ReasoningLogical Reasoning
The majority of todays office-based jobs require thoughtful, logical decisions, as well as the ability to rationalize them.
Fallacy of the undistributed middle
The fallacy of the undistributed middle occurs when the statement that links the two premises is never distributed. This can introduce errors at the early stages of the decision-making process.
Non-independent events
Recognizing when two events are independent is often important when making a decision.
Attribute substitution
When we try to answer a difficult question, we often actually answer a related but different question, without realizing that a substitution has taken place and this can lead to wrong decisions.
Double counting
Double counting is a fallacy in which we count events two or more times, resulting in an erroneous number of event, which is higher than the true result. Such mistakes are often very costly.
Gambler's fallacy
Also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy, the gambler's fallacy is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future, and can lead to wrong decisions.
Correlation and causation
Establishing a cause-and-effect relationship where one doesn't exist is a common cause for making wrong decisions.
Affirming a disjunct
The fallacy lies in concluding that one disjunct must be false because the other disjunct is true. It's important to recognize that both disjuncts might be true when making decisions.
Deductive logic
Also known as deductive reasoning, this is the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It is a necessary part of any argument.
Fallacy of division
A fallacy of division occurs when one mistakenly concludes that something true for the whole must also be true of all or some of its parts.
Set theory
Reasoning if something is or isn't part of a group, or of an intersection of two groups is a common task on everyday job.
Affirming the consequent
Also known as the fallacy of the converse, this involves taking a true conditional statement and invalidly inferring its converse, even though the converse may not be true. Such errors are very common and can result in a failure to consider other causes.
Circular reasoning
A logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to conclude. Failing to notice such a fallacy can lead to making important decision based on arguments that are not necessarily true.
Fallacy of composition
The error of assuming that what is true of a member of a group is true for the group as a whole.
Conjunction fallacy
Assuming that specific conditions are more probable than a single general one can easily lead to less than optimal decisions.
Illicit major
One should not assume that a converse statement is true, despite a related claim.
Masked-man fallacy
One can't assume that knowing an identity and not knowing another identity means that they cannot both be the same thing.
Existential fallacy
One should not assume that a group has members when it has not been stated.
Modal Fallacy
Inferring that because something is true, it is necessarily true can lead to false assumptions.
Fallacy of exclusive premises
A valid syllogism can't have two negative premises. For exclusive premises, both are negative and the syllogism is invalid. Not noticing this can lead to unwanted results.
Argument from fallacy
Automatically accepting that the conclusion is wrong because one of the arguments is wrong means that we can be subject to manipulation.
Score Distribution
Loading...